In a significant policy development* for Texas water utilities, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has announced acceptance of predictive modeling and statistical analysis for completing baseline service line inventories under the newly finalized Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LCRI). This decision provides Texas water systems with powerful new tools to efficiently identify and classify unknown service lines while managing the substantial compliance costs associated with the federal mandate to replace all lead service lines within 10 years.
For water utility decision makers, this change represents both an opportunity and a responsibility. Utilities can now leverage advanced technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and statistical modeling to accelerate inventory completion, prioritize field investigations, and optimize replacement planning – potentially saving millions in compliance costs. However, utilities remain fully responsible for the accuracy and reliability of their results, making careful vendor selection and methodology validation critical to success.
The federal EPA has set November 1, 2027, as the deadline for the baseline inventory. This deadline may seem distant, but successful risk modeling implementation requires months of preparation, vendor evaluation, data cleaning, and validation. Utility leaders should begin evaluating options now to ensure their organizations are positioned for compliance success.
As Erica Walker, National Lead and Copper Rule Practice Leader at Arcadis, notes:
TCEQ's acceptance of risk modeling for LCRI compliance represents a significant opportunity for forward-thinking Texas water utilities. By leveraging advanced analytics and machine learning, utilities can transform what appears to be an overwhelming regulatory burden into a manageable, cost-effective program.
Utilities nationwide are already using AI-powered predictive modeling to accelerate their inventories and reduce unknowns. Las Vegas Valley Water District, NV and Rock Hill, SC are just two examples that show what this approach can achieve: faster verification, fewer unnecessary excavations, and more strategic use of field crews. Their results highlight the tangible benefits Texas utilities can expect as they adopt the newly approved modeling pathway.
As utilities begin acting on these priorities, many are looking for clear guidance on how to structure their compliance plans. Arcadis, one of the nation’s most experienced LCRR/LCRI consulting firms, has outlined a clear, practical roadmap in their guide, “Prioritizing Lead & Copper Rule compliance before 2027,” covering funding strategies, school testing programs, inventorying, and more.
See case studies from utilities using AI in the field →
The question is no longer whether to use risk modeling, but how to implement it most effectively for your utility and community. The tools are available, the regulatory path is clear, and the cost savings are substantial. Texas utilities that embrace this opportunity will lead the way in protecting public health while responsibly stewarding ratepayer resources.
Sources:
* LSLI Investigations Example Standard Operating Procedure
* Lead and Copper Rule Revisions and Lead and Copper Rule Improvements
This article is part of our Utility Voices series – where we share real stories, field-tested insights, and trusted perspectives from across the water sector. From frontline engineers to leading consultants, from early questions to proven outcomes, these are the voices shaping the future of water.
🔔 Subscribe to our blog so you don’t miss the next chapter.